Jump to content







Poll: How Deep Into the Post-Season Will The Hawks Go? (28 votes)

How deep will the Blackhawks go in the playoffs?

  1. Conference Quarter-Finalist (6 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

  2. Conference Semi-Finalist (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  3. Conference Finalist (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  4. Stanley Cup Finalist (1 votes [3.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.57%

  5. Stanley Cup Winner (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote



Highlights


Your Word

View All Updates

Olsen Sent Down; Montador Activated

* * * - -


Dylan Olsen's taste of NHL action is over with Steve Montador activated off IR and ready to get back in the line-up for the Hawks.

In his 2 NHL games, Olsen managed to stay even with a plus-minus of zero which is fairly impressive considering the Blackhawks conceded 9 goals in both games while only scoring 4. The Blackhawks 1st round pick (28th overall) in 2009 was also able to jump into the fray offensively--putting 4 pucks on net along with bringing his physical demeanor to the line-up by finishing 6 hits.

Although many consider him to be raw, he didn't really have much of an issue with Joel Quenneville allowing him to play just over 15 minutes against the Avalanche on Friday and could be a viable option later in the season if the Blackhawks cannot pick up a defense-man through the trade market.

Steve Montador returns to the line-up after suffering an undisclosed injury December 30th against the Red Wings. Monty missed 3 games which all resulted in losses for the Blackhawks. The versatile defense-man has 5 goals and 5 assists on the year including 1 game-winner. The Blackhawks are 24-10-4 with him in the line-up and 0-3-0 without him dressed.

YOUR CALL


chasman
Jan 08 2012 12:30 AM
That's bull shit, he should stay up, he's playing better than any 5 or 6 D man

Ton
Jan 08 2012 01:13 AM
I agree. I wasn't overly impressed with him but I did see a lot of things I did like. He was definitely better than any of the guys we currently have in the revolving #6 slot.

howcho
Jan 08 2012 02:14 AM
I thought at time that he made some poor passes in his own end, pucks that either did not make it out over the blue line or to their intended recipient. Other than that, I thought he played ok.

CLWolf81
Jan 08 2012 03:22 AM

View PostTon, on 08 January 2012 - 01:13 AM, said:

I agree. I wasn't overly impressed with him but I did see a lot of things I did like. He was definitely better than any of the guys we currently have in the revolving #6 slot.

I'm thinking its more for TOI reasons. With Montador back, I doubt Dylan would get as much time as he should get down in Rockford. I totally agree with what you said, though, too.

Tater
Jan 08 2012 09:01 AM
Can't wait to see this kid after he gets some more games under his belt.The D could sure use his size and hits.

Grimson
Jan 08 2012 03:18 PM

View PostTater, on 08 January 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:

Can't wait to see this kid after he gets some more games under his belt.The D could sure use his size and hits.

Hitting doesn't matterberg though.

TJD
Jan 09 2012 04:08 AM
I like Olsen, but as already stated, let him get 25+ minutes in Rockford.

EspoForever
Jan 10 2012 04:31 PM

View Postchasman, on 08 January 2012 - 12:30 AM, said:

That's bull shit, he should stay up, he's playing better than any 5 or 6 D man
I have been very encouraged by Olsen's play since the first time I saw him play 2-3 years back in a tryout game for the Canadian IIHF Junior team, paired with Lalonde. I thought that night he out-played Lalonde, though neither player was named to the IIHF team, and I saw just one game.

I also thought he did a real nice job this time though we have to remember he was exposed to the top lines of opponents much and there is nothing wrong with letting him get some more seasoning before permenently putting him under the spotlight. He will certainly make it easy for O'Donnell to retire at the end of the season!

PYsebaert
Jan 17 2012 02:59 PM
Dylan looked ok with some poor pass decision, will be good down the stretch... Just have to ask, Conolly is a point per game D down in Rockford and Lalonde has been on peoples lips for years. How come non of them has givin a chance in Chicago?

I Have not seen any of them play, so anyone with some input?

Grimson
Jan 17 2012 03:42 PM
Lalonde tore it up in juniors. I have seen him live about 3x in Rockford (a couple years ago) and he looked solid against AHL talent. Maybe he just had a few good games because his stats haven't been all that great.

I always compared his style of play (not physical stature) to Seabrook. Right now another Seabrook is just what this team needs.

MassHavoc
Jan 17 2012 06:52 PM
Another Seabrook, or Seabrook to play like all-star Seabrook? Not that he's playing bad, just that he has been dominant at times.

pmxc12873
Jan 17 2012 07:51 PM
Is anyone playing good to you on this 60pt team?

MassHavoc
Jan 17 2012 08:05 PM
Pawel Prylinski

Grimson
Jan 17 2012 08:07 PM
Stalberg is carrying the team... everyone else suckslik!

Ton
Jan 17 2012 11:06 PM
I thought Olsen was more of a Seabrook-type than Lalonde. I thought Lalonde was more of a Wisniewski-type, maybe a little Brian Campbell mixed with that.

PYsebaert
Jan 18 2012 12:49 PM
I take that all day in the week... So he's still one of our best prospects when it comes to off minded D's?
Didnt people call for him to start with the Hawks in trainging camp in our SC winning season?

How about Connolly?