Jump to content







Poll: How Deep Into the Post-Season Will The Hawks Go? (28 votes)

How deep will the Blackhawks go in the playoffs?

  1. Conference Quarter-Finalist (6 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

  2. Conference Semi-Finalist (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  3. Conference Finalist (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  4. Stanley Cup Finalist (1 votes [3.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.57%

  5. Stanley Cup Winner (7 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote



Highlights


Your Word

View All Updates

The Bowman Effect

* * * * *


With the deadline looming, Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman has the equivalent of nearly $15 million in cap space that is growing in size every single day.

Two and a half years after being hired in place of Dale Tallon, perhaps we can go back and piece together the puzzle that Bowman is attempting to put together. Adding Brendan Morrison last week only built Bowmans trade résumé, adding another clue to the search, but once you put all of it together the picture starts to become a little more clear that the direction Bowman may be taking could have provided enough smoke and mirrors to get away with a state of rebuilding.

(Listings are in order of time completion)

2010 TRADES

Cam Barker ⇛ Nick Leddy
Kris Versteeg ⇛ Viktor Stalberg, Philippe Paradis, Chris DiDomenico
Dustin Byfuglien, Ben Eager, Brent Sopel ⇛ Jeremy Morin, Kevin Hayes, Justin Holl
Colin Fraser ⇛ Mirko Hoefflin
30th pick 2010 to NYI ⇛ Ludvig Rensfeldt, Kent Simpson
32nd pick 2010 to TOR ⇛ Brandon Saad, Michael Paliotta
43rd pick 2010 to TOR ⇛ Jimmy Hayes
Andrew Ladd ⇛ Adam Clendening

2011 TRADES

Jack Skille, Hugh Jessiman, David Pacan ⇛ Michael Frolik, Alexander Salak
Troy Brouwer ⇛ Philip Danault
Brian Campbell ⇛ Cap Space, err Rostislav Olesz
Tomas Kopecky ⇛ Steve Montador *
Brian Connelly ⇛ Brendan Morrison

*In sending the negotiating rights of Tomas Kopecky to Florida for a conditional 7th round pick, the Blackhawks flipped the same pick to Buffalo for the negotiating rights to Steve Montador. In a nutshell, that pick was integral in both deals, connecting them together.

WAIVER WIRE

No additions that remain in the organization

FREE AGENTS (UFA, RFA)

Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith, John Scott, Niklas Hjalmarsson, Bryan Bickell, Nick Leddy, Brandon Pirri, Dylan Olsen, Brent Seabrook, Jimmy Hayes, Corey Crawford, Byron Froese, David Gilbert, Alexander Salak, Steve Montador, Jamal Mayers, Sean O'Donnell, Andrew Brunette, Dan Carcillo, Viktor Stalberg, Sami Lepisto, Michael Frolik, Patrick Sharp, Ray Emery, Mark McNeill, Philip Danault, Andrew Shaw

Of course, the definition of rebuild is a loose term. No, I am not suggesting Bowman is going to dismantle this team or any sort of ridiculous notion that he will even remotely entertain the thought of trading any of his core players. However, it's clear to me that during most of his tenure, Stan has been in rebuild mode in a different sense. He's acquiring band-aids to fill the gaps until "his" players are ready to fit in the line-up. "His" players being all the youth he has acquired through the trade market. Luckily for him, unlike Dale Tallon, he has a fantastic core to hold the fort while these players develop and become NHL-ready.

The acquisition of Brendan Morrison was far from confusing when looking at his track record. Even last year with limited cap space, Bowman was able to swing a few deals to acquire Michael Frolik, Ryan Johnson, and Chris Campoli at the deadline in an effort to provide depth to the roster. Unfortunately, it didn't work, and Bowmans band-aid scheme failed for the first season. Given his circumstances, he was given a pass due to the contract demands of the prior summer forcing him to ship key players.

Over the summer, he continued the trend, signing 6 UFA's to 1-year deals. Perhaps further proof of Bowman's plan unfolding before our very eyes--almost eerily similar to Dale Tallon's approach during his first couple seasons. This time things would be different through the fan perception, the Blackhawks had plenty of cap space and the depth seemed to be stronger. I don't want to say it was wrong to think that, because the deadline has not passed yet and anything can happen. But all indications point to Bowman once again filling important roles with another band-aid instead of a solid solution.

Is it wrong? No. Does it give the Blackhawks the best chance to win right now? Probably not. But at some point the game has to change for Bowman, no longer should he be looking for deals to improve the future while patching up the present moment but shift the philosophy in realizing his window of opportunity might be starting as early as right now.

Perhaps this year is the wrong time for that change, maybe next year when Saad, Shaw, Hayes, Olsen, Smith, Pirri, Morin, are all ready to fill the shoes left behind by the old-timers will be the moment Stan changes his philosophy from "rebuild" to "this is the year". Because, lets be honest, if that is his plan then perhaps that truly is the best route to take if the Blackhawks want to carry the Cup through Chicago again. This isn't to say this year is lost, because it isn't. But perhaps more of an acceptance of what Bowman is trying to accomplish. The writing is on the wall, it's just a matter of perception.

YOUR CALL


Mach29
Feb 05 2012 06:28 PM
Sounds good on paper - I'm glad there's a plan to what's turning a little frustrating and ugly lately. Would be better if it was more from Bowman.

TJD
Feb 05 2012 11:18 PM
Spot on.

This goes hand in hand with my article on letting the youth develop. Jimmy Hayes obviously could play on this team and I bet next year he gets a shot for top 6 minutes or even 3rd line. I'd like to see Olsen eventually take Hammer's minutes away, but that depends on the rest of this season.

Sharp-Toews-Kane
LW- Prospect or Bolland-Hossa

To me next season we have openings at LW and Center for the top two lines. If Stalberg keeps up his momentum and consitency, then he could be the LW. Hell, Saad might be too good for juniors next year.

Tha's how I see it.

Ton
Feb 06 2012 01:21 PM
I agree Trev. While it's frustrating to see old band-aids like Brunette, Morrison, and O'Donnell in the line-up right now... you just have to remember what is waiting in the pipe-line.

To me, it's pretty clear Bowman wants his guys to develop. I truly believe Bowman thinks that next year will start our window of opportunity. Similar to how Tallon had a window of about 2 years to win the Cup with that team. After that, those young kids will demand big contracts and he'll start the process all over again. This isn't to say we won't be competitive during his rebuilds, because we have a great core, but it's quite obvious that the Salary Cap era is going to be about capitalizing on the low contracts of good, young players. The problem is timing--he has to let them develop and hope a good chunk of them can produce around the same time while their contracts are still low.

IceHogsFan
Feb 06 2012 04:39 PM
Good thoughts Ton

Rex
Feb 06 2012 05:08 PM

View PostTJD, on 05 February 2012 - 11:18 PM, said:

Spot on.

This goes hand in hand with my article on letting the youth develop. Jimmy Hayes obviously could play on this team and I bet next year he gets a shot for top 6 minutes or even 3rd line. I'd like to see Olsen eventually take Hammer's minutes away, but that depends on the rest of this season.

Sharp-Toews-Kane
LW- Prospect or Bolland-Hossa

To me next season we have openings at LW and Center for the top two lines. If Stalberg keeps up his momentum and consitency, then he could be the LW. Hell, Saad might be too good for juniors next year.

Tha's how I see it.

if Q got his head out of his ass, the top six is already chosen, and signed for the next 4+ years

Stalberg-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Bolland-Hossa

all those guys are locked up except Stalberg. It's the bottom six that is worrisome.

Rex
Feb 06 2012 05:10 PM
oh, and the Ladd deal was for Vishnevskiy and a second (Clandening) I think the worst thing is, Ladd was the biggest player we lost that season (at least to me) and we got basically nothing for him.

Ton
Feb 06 2012 05:12 PM
I know that, but I only included players that are still in the organization to show what we've gained out of each deal. For example, Barker didn't just land us Leddy, and technically Kopecky was not traded for Montador. It's pretty much cut to the bottom line of what we received for each deal.

I'm not sure we got "nothing" for Ladd yet, Clendening looks very promising.

CLWolf81
Feb 06 2012 06:25 PM

View PostTon, on 06 February 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

I know that, but I only included players that are still in the organization to show what we've gained out of each deal. For example, Barker didn't just land us Leddy, and technically Kopecky was not traded for Montador. It's pretty much cut to the bottom line of what we received for each deal.

I'm not sure we got "nothing" for Ladd yet, Clendening looks very promising.

Prospects Camp proved that. He looked good from what I saw. Liking that kid. On the bright side, he's a D-man, and he looks like a decently balanced d-man... we don't have many of those around. He'd make a great 3 or 4 someday.

Rex
Feb 06 2012 06:29 PM

View PostCLWolf81, on 06 February 2012 - 06:25 PM, said:

Prospects Camp proved that. He looked good from what I saw. Liking that kid. On the bright side, he's a D-man, and he looks like a decently balanced d-man... we don't have many of those around. He'd make a great 3 or 4 someday.

Allow me to retort, We didn't get nearly as much for a player of Ladd's calibre as I would have liked. Another Russian who fled to the KHL because he didn't make the team right away. Fuck him AND Makarov. If you want something, you gotta earn it.

Pez68
Feb 06 2012 06:59 PM

View PostRex, on 06 February 2012 - 05:10 PM, said:

oh, and the Ladd deal was for Vishnevskiy and a second (Clandening) I think the worst thing is, Ladd was the biggest player we lost that season (at least to me) and we got basically nothing for him.

That's because the organization completely undervalued Ladd. I recall several of us asking several times why Ladd was never used on the PP or PK with this club, when it was obvious he would be successful doing either. Q seemed completely opposed to giving him a chance aside from the shutdown line.

Ton
Feb 06 2012 07:06 PM

View PostPez68, on 06 February 2012 - 06:59 PM, said:

That's because the organization completely undervalued Ladd. I recall several of us asking several times why Ladd was never used on the PP or PK with this club, when it was obvious he would be successful doing either. Q seemed completely opposed to giving him a chance aside from the shutdown line.

Scary to think about when Bolland is being toyed with in a similar way.

Pez68
Feb 06 2012 07:11 PM
Bingo.

Except I heard the lines at practice were as follows so maybe he's finally fucking getting it with Bolland:

65-19-88
10-36-81
16-17-25
29-22-67

Way to reward Stalberg by demoting him though. If Kruger isn't going to play center, there's no reason for him to be up here.

Ton
Feb 06 2012 07:28 PM
They aren't playing Kruger at center because he's terrible at faceoffs. Not sure why Shaw is on the 1st line, he's better suited on line 3 or 4.

Pez68
Feb 06 2012 07:43 PM
I know that, but there are better winger options in Rockford for the bottom six. If Kruger isn't up here to play center, he shouldn't be up here. He really contributes that little.

ericthered
Feb 06 2012 07:45 PM
More details/minutia from the Bowman ledger:

The pick Bowman sent to Ottawa for Chris Campoli (Bowman also got a conditional 2012 7th rd pick) , ended up in Detroit via a trade (they moved out of the 1st rd to get a 2nd rd pick); and they used it to select in the 2nd rd 2011 Draft: #48 D Xavier Ouellet

Potulny playing in Ottawa this season is the condition for the Hawks to get this 7th rd. pick, so it's unlikely as he's currently in the Caps org. Hershey Bears AHL. However if Washington somehow trades him to Ottawa (and Ottawa suits him up for 1 game...bring on that 7th rd. pick).

The #32 pick that CHI gave Tor for the 2010 Draft was in a roundabout way connected to the Phil Kessel Boston trade and the Hawks trade of Robert Lang (to MTL).

Tor used that pick to select #32 C Jared Knight

The Hawks traded their first-round pick 2010 Draft to the NYI on June 25, 2010 that sent a pair of second round picks (#35 and #58 overall) to Chicago in exchange for this pick.

Hawks used those second round picks (as you noted Ton) on:
#35 was Ludvig Rensfeldt
#58 was Kent Simpson

NYI used that first round pick on: #30 (last pick of the first round) C Brock Nelson

In the 2nd round the Hawks traded with Tor for Jimmy Hayes (that pick sent to Toronto was from the Rene Bourque deal with Calgary that Dale Tallon made).

43rd pick in the 2010 draft (the Jimmy Hayes trade) netted Toronto LW Brad Ross.

Rex
Feb 07 2012 05:49 AM

View PostPez68, on 06 February 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I know that, but there are better winger options in Rockford for the bottom six. If Kruger isn't up here to play center, he shouldn't be up here. He really contributes that little.

couldn't fucking agree more. Kruger should be in Rockford if there isn't a center spot for him. The third line wingers should be Shaw and Hayes, with Stalberg on the top line with Toews and Kane.

Maiden
Feb 07 2012 02:33 PM

View PostTon, on 06 February 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:

They aren't playing Kruger at center because he's terrible at faceoffs. Not sure why Shaw is on the 1st line, he's better suited on line 3 or 4.

Just because you're listed as the center doesnt mean you have to take face offs. There's plenty of center men who don't.

MassHavoc
Feb 07 2012 05:10 PM

View Postericthered, on 06 February 2012 - 07:45 PM, said:

More details/minutia from the Bowman ledger:

The pick Bowman sent to Ottawa for Chris Campoli (Bowman also got a conditional 2012 7th rd pick) , ended up in Detroit via a trade (they moved out of the 1st rd to get a 2nd rd pick); and they used it to select in the 2nd rd 2011 Draft: #48 D Xavier Ouellet

Potulny playing in Ottawa this season is the condition for the Hawks to get this 7th rd. pick, so it's unlikely as he's currently in the Caps org. Hershey Bears AHL. However if Washington somehow trades him to Ottawa (and Ottawa suits him up for 1 game...bring on that 7th rd. pick).

The #32 pick that CHI gave Tor for the 2010 Draft was in a roundabout way connected to the Phil Kessel Boston trade and the Hawks trade of Robert Lang (to MTL).

Tor used that pick to select #32 C Jared Knight

The Hawks traded their first-round pick 2010 Draft to the NYI on June 25, 2010 that sent a pair of second round picks (#35 and #58 overall) to Chicago in exchange for this pick.

Hawks used those second round picks (as you noted Ton) on:
#35 was Ludvig Rensfeldt
#58 was Kent Simpson

NYI used that first round pick on: #30 (last pick of the first round) C Brock Nelson

In the 2nd round the Hawks traded with Tor for Jimmy Hayes (that pick sent to Toronto was from the Rene Bourque deal with Calgary that Dale Tallon made).

43rd pick in the 2010 draft (the Jimmy Hayes trade) netted Toronto LW Brad Ross.
Sweet jesus I don't know how you guys keep track of all this stuff.

Ton
Feb 07 2012 07:07 PM

View PostMaiden, on 07 February 2012 - 02:33 PM, said:

Just because you're listed as the center doesnt mean you have to take face offs. There's plenty of center men who don't.

Name one.

R K
Feb 07 2012 07:10 PM
isn't a Center who doesn't take faceoffs a LW or RW?

Ton
Feb 07 2012 07:13 PM
I mean, taking face-offs is an important part of being a center... I suppose it's possible a winger could take the face-off but why would a team start their shift out of position? I'd like to see an example because I don't know "plenty" of teams who do that... or even one team that does that.

LordKOTL
Feb 07 2012 07:19 PM
For awhile when we had Yannic Perrault wasn't he swapped in to take a face-off and then shifted to a wing when the play got going?

Ton
Feb 07 2012 07:23 PM
Yanic would take the face-off then get off the ice because he just sucked other than that... lol

BlackhawkPaul
Feb 07 2012 07:31 PM

View PostLordKOTL, on 07 February 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:

For awhile when we had Yannic Perrault wasn't he swapped in to take a face-off and then shifted to a wing when the play got going?
Problem was he was only good on one side of the net when it came to draws.
It seemed he was always on the scoresheet when he was in town with a Coyotes uniform on.

Maiden
Feb 07 2012 07:50 PM

View PostR K, on 07 February 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:

isn't a Center who doesn't take faceoffs a LW or RW?

No its called a play maker who sucks at taking face offs.

winos5
Feb 07 2012 08:30 PM
Is a LW/RW that takes faceoffs a closet center?

R K
Feb 07 2012 08:34 PM

View Postwinos5, on 07 February 2012 - 08:30 PM, said:

Is a LW/RW that takes faceoffs a closet center?


Apparently not. It's just someone whos not good at playing Center.

MassHavoc
Feb 07 2012 08:50 PM
Who's on first?

BigPete
Feb 08 2012 04:46 AM
How's that Soupdog to FL trade looking, Scooter? Great fucking job...

Rex
Feb 08 2012 05:08 AM
I'm sure he will blame Tallon for making the signing in the first place