Last Game
Blackhawks
SCORE
1 - 3
LOSS
Red Wings
Donations
-
Send an Assist
Help us Score!
All of us are here for one reason: We love the Chicago Blackhawks. If you like our style, we accept beer money. Find out more information here!
Recent Status Updates
-
GrimsonovGretzky scored 122 career playoff goals on 299 total shots. Dude shot 40.8% in the playoffs. Sick.
Show comments (6)
-
The Canadian DreamalchukSoon as Subban touched the ice for team Canada they lose. Why keep allowing these Subbans to play on the national teams?
Show comments (5)
-
BlackhawkPaulI have 2 for tonight Section 326, Row 9 Seats 3,4. Face value is $80 per. PM me an offer and they're yours.
Show comments (7)
0
Has the Identity of the Blackhawks Returned?
940 views
Tuesday, 01.29.2013 | 09:29 PM | Features
Seemingly endless banter about the team has been created by odd moves, over the top expectations and mainly, the failure to return to the electrifying team we experienced for two seasons. For two seasons the almost infantile Hawks took us fans on a roller coaster ride. In 2008-09 we saw them rip through a circus road trip that for almost a decade marked the point were the season turned for the worse, showcased in the NHL’s best in the Winter Classic, won the division, and most importantly succeed in the playoffs. The next season they delivered what every fan dreams of.
Although the team has been successful on paper, in the standings and crossed the threshold into the post-season, the two seasons in between the Cup victory were as flat as a Coke from 1998. Watching a team with six bonafide all stars rank behind Columbus Blue Jackets on the power play is something that can be difficult to process. Seeing a team almost unresponsive when a teammate is laid out on the ice is something hockey fans just are not used to. Overall the consensus from fans and the league has been that we simply lost the intangibles that made us that good just a few years back. All around sports fans hear about the “it” factor, and from the role players and locker room guys, to guys who are now creating their legacies elsewhere, the feeling about the Hawks was we simply do not have “it”.
Intangible is defined as not able to be touched or grasped, and up until the start of this year the theme to return to greatness appeared perfectly tangible. Simply grab a center, tough defenseman, improve special teams, etc… yet the scintillating start of this season has taught me otherwise.
In this short mini-series of a season as I’ll call it, my critiques of the team have slapped me in the face. The bottom line with Michael Frolik and Marcus Kruger, two guys who at one point hoped to take a top-six role, have created chemistry and represented role-playing that we have not seen since 2010. Frolik, a 10th overall pick in 2006 seems to have taken his 4th line spot as something he’s been destined for, great fore-checking, boundless energy, amassed 17 shots, solid shifts and with Kruger provides a penalty kill that actually makes Don Cherry appreciate some European softies.
Prominence on the blue line has returned as well. Johnny Oduya seems to be the Brian Campbell imposter that Niklas Hjalmarsson needed to prove why Doug Wilson drove up his salary a few years back. In turn, Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook are not being overused like Mark Prior and can return to the titans of the blue line we have always known. On top of these lines, our baptism by fire or trial and error experiment with Nick Leddy has paid dividends. His game has elevated in every facet, along the boards, offensively, mentally, the list goes on, his time on ice is way down, but oddly in the best way possible. Everyone recalls the last time we rolled three great, balanced, and effective lines on defense.
There is no doubt this short compressed season will be an odd one, yet already there are more parallels to be drawn to the team we all have been yearning to get back to. It is far too early to predict anything, and six games are far too small of a sample to think everything will keep up this way. But that flat Coke we have tasted the past two seasons has without a doubt been washed away with unbridled optimism.
A whopping six games in and this team has already shed many critics from the off-season. That may include me in a few weeks but until then I will sit and enjoy the show, win lose or draw, or that stupid skills competition the games now go into.
You may also like:
- Player Evaluation: Ray Emery
Sep 04 2012 09:40 PM
Let's face it, Emery had an opportunity to re-claim his status as a #1 goaltender in the NHL... - Total Collapse in Edmonton: What Kind of Fan Ar...
Feb 03 2012 06:50 PM
Who cares what the score was. Last night was kind of funny in some ways, and there are a few diff... - Red Wings (23-12-1) VS Blackhawks (23-10-4) - 1...
Dec 30 2011 11:54 PM
On November 24, 1926 one of the greatest rivalries in sports began, Blackhawks and Red Wings go a... - Blackhawks vs. Canucks
Apr 23 2013 12:00 AM
MR. PRESIDENT — If the Blackhawks can beat the Canucks, and the Ottawa Senators beat the Pittsbur...
54 Comments | Join the discussion
So far, I think we've seen that this team can display just as much talent as the team in 2010, but as far as grit I'm not so sure it's there (yet)... but it doesn't have to be the same team to win, doesn't have to be the same identity as long as they have an identity, and I do think our depth does provide a lot of intangibles. I think that's the most important thing here. They've battled hard for their record so far... I will say I haven't been this excited to see where they are by the end of the season since 2010. I think, so far, they have proved that they will be a great regular season team this year. I just hope they can win in the playoffs.
Exactly, while I am wanting to jump to conclusions, it is pure speculation and hope at this point.
One thing that cannot be debated is the fact that this 6 game win streak has a greater impact in our 48 game season then it would any other year. Something that should give us a head full of confidence moving forward.
It's equivalent to 10 games in a full season. Didn't we have a 10-12 game streak in 2010?
I believe 9, the franchise record to, that also was apart of the circus road trip we tore a new asshole.
Didnt they go like 5-1-1 on a February road trip or something?
That shit was awesome.
Got quality seats for Friday's BIG win.
The six games is so significant in this shorten season that the Hawks could go .500 (pts %) the rest of the way and that would have them at 54 pts which should be enough for a playoff berth.
Interesting thought, yet all I can think of is 48-0. Hahah
Just think "Eight out of the gate"; should be doable after watching the Wild take dumb penalties and wear themselves out on a team like Columbus.
12.5% of season done. Zero losses.
Let it ride!!!
The team the last two years - while described as "flat" - was in a transition mode.
There is no doubt that they did not have any choices to go through this.
They had to restructure the salaries of the team - due to high/rising contracts...and what will now be a 6mil dollar reduction in the cap - within 3yrs of the Cup.
Management had to make some important decisions - identify the core group, trade what assets they could (while other teams knew they were in cap hell), and allow some of the youth to develop. Some here, some in Jr's/Minors. It takes time. Those things are impossible to happen overnight. There has been some tremendous patience shown on their behalf while everyone wants a "win now" mentality.
While the last 2 playoffs may have been labeled as "failures" and disappointments by fans...fact is..this team wasn't far off in each of the 2 playoff exits, to VAN (who lost in game 7 of the finals) or PHX who lost in the Conference finals. Health had a major factor in the playoffs over anything, in each of those 2 series - to key players...but that seems to be overlooked and the Hawks get labeled as "flat" or not giving effort, or simply failing.
Now, 2 years later, this team is revamped. They are sitting in both a very good cap postion as well as having a pretty good talent pool of youth, to fill in when some salaries get too high...or if there are injuries. While not every prospect will be a top tier player, there seems to be a good amount of competition there when opportunities come.
This team has had center issues. Would Grabovski or Plekanec be a saviour for this team's 2nd center role? Would they have been worth a 1st round pick (TT..McNeil)? And guarantee a better team...or a first round win one of those 2 last seasons? Or now...the Hawks have young centers in Kruger, Shaw, McNeil, Danault, KHayes....all in the pipeline - and hope one or two can fill in? They've allowed Stalberg to develop, hang on to Bickell...while also having Saad, TT, Morin...Shalunov...all be able to maybe become a top 6 with the other core 5 they have in place.
They have bottom 6 forwards in Smith, JHayes, Flick, Bollig...or any of the others that done pan out as top 6 in the future.
The patience of the Hawks, the belief in building through the draft, hanging on to prospects for the long term health of this team instead of the band aid fixes...has been the identity of the Hawks. Fiscal responsiblilty in identifying that if they are going to try to sign a player (Parise, Suter)...they would be impact players...rather than the midlevel (3-5mil dollar players) in a Fleischmann or a Kopecky
The team is built to be healthy both financially and in talent, and the vision has always been there, IMO. It just took time to restructure when they were financially handcuffed.
I would say that unlike the past 2 years, they have formed at least the beginnings of a new identity.
why is he still with the Hawks...if he has not even cracked a game with us at this point...what is the point of keeping him?
And this is why I think come April 1st...they need to add some of that...not just someone that can brawl...but can score too, likes of Eager and Adam.
Brouwer - 189 hits - Shaw 82 hits (37gms...pace for 182)
Ladd - 104 hits - Bickell 128hits (71gms)
Byfuglien - 215hits - Carcillo 72 hits (28gms..pace for 210)
Kopecky - 72 hits - Frolik 56 hits (63gms)
Eager - 51hits (60gms) or Burish - Bollig 27 hits (18gms)...Mayers 102 hits
Now Shaw and Carcillo may not have the size of Brouwer or Byfuglien...but they don't skate as well as those 2.
Kruger may be more skilled than Madden was at the end of his career...and he's not afraid to get his nose dirty.
The Defence 5/6 with Leddy/Rosival/Brookbank...is more skilled than the Sopel/Boynton/Hendry pairing
Not to mention Toews, Kane, Hjarll, Bolland being more experienced.
The only thing I agree with here is that the defense is more talented and Kruger is more skilled than Madden. Otherwise, you can't compare any of the other players. Shaw, Bickell, Frolik, and Carcillo are nothing like Kopecky, Ladd, Byfuglien, and Brouwer.
And I'm perfectly OK with that. I loved the 2010 team but things have changed. The biggest thing they lacked the last two years was having a defined role for each person on the team, so far this season I like what I see in terms of identity and having everyone on the same page.
And those 4 - Shaw, Frolik, Carcillo and Bickell have more speed than Ladd, Kopecky, Byfuglien and Brouwer
And as Bickell may be inconsistant...I remember a certain Byfuglien being lazy as all hell for long stretches.
I think it's ridiculous because this team didn't win the cup the last two years, they get labeled at times as not caring, lazy, under achieving, flat, not trying, etc
Yeah, like I said it's a new look. That 2010 team wasn't slow either, but those four do have more speed but less size. Byfuglien was inconsistent but he got hot at the right times, so far Bickell hasn't really proved that he can do that.
We'll see if this is a team that can win in the playoffs -- so far they haven't. I hope that changes this year. If not Bowman might want to look at those big bodies again to help create space and take away the attention from the skilled guys.
Also don't forget Versteeg and Campbell were on those teams which provided a lot of speed.
2010-2011- Lose in 7 to VAN -
Kopecky - out 6gms (knocked out gm 1)
Brouwer - playing with 1 shoulder
Bolland - out 3gms
Bickell - out 2gms
Seabrook - out 2 1/2gms (Scott played D for him)
Those are 4 of their top 9 forwards and their top Dman. And they plugged in a couple of 20yr olds in Kruger and Leddy..and they went to game 7 OT. I don't get how/why that is such a failure as some make it.
And Last year...in a series they dominated/carried the play in most parts -
Lost Hossa, Shaw...Toews was no where near 100%..so 2 top 6 forwards and Shaw..and they lost 5 1-goal games (all in OT). Yes, they lost the series and it sucked...but it wasn't a lack of effort, heart, being flat,no identity...I'd think those 3 100%/playing in all games and things may have been different.
Yes, it sucks they don't win the cup every year. But health has had way more to do in the playoffs than anything. It's not a coincidence that the team that wins the cup (including the Hawks in 2010)...is relatively the healthiest - especially to their key players.
For the most part I think Torres should have been jumped within 2 seconds with gloves off on that hit, Bollig was playing in his 20 something game and had to engage him, did a good job. But I wasn't talking about that hit, we did respond. Now when Seabrook was hit, they was maybe a shove...theres also been countless times were our team has just sat silent after something that usually lights a fire under a teams ass.
And pmx, I was far from ripping this team. Even if I was like many people have, there is a lot of merit to the things in bold. Also read the part where I said the expectations were way too high.